Why “Good Enough” is Good Enough Early On

This issue is sponsored by Masterworks

Last Time the Market Was This Expensive, Investors Waited 14 Years to Break Even

In 1999, the S&P 500 peaked. Then it took 14 years to gradually recover by 2013.

Today? Goldman Sachs sounds crazy forecasting 3% returns for 2024 to 2034.

But we’re currently seeing the highest price for the S&P 500 compared to earnings since the dot-com boom.

So, maybe that’s why they’re not alone; Vanguard projects about 5%.

In fact, now just about everything seems priced near all time highs. Equities, gold, crypto, etc.

But billionaires have long diversified a slice of their portfolios with one asset class that is poised to rebound.

It’s post war and contemporary art.

Sounds crazy, but over 70,000 investors have followed suit since 2019—with Masterworks.

You can invest in shares of artworks featuring Banksy, Basquiat, Picasso, and more.

24 exits later, results speak for themselves: net annualized returns like 14.6%, 17.6%, and 17.8%.*

My subscribers can skip the waitlist.

Skip waitlist

_{*Investing involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future returns. Important Reg A disclosures: masterworks.com/cd.}

The Counterintuitive Case for Imperfection

There’s a specific kind of anxiety that hits most early-stage founders.

Your product works. People are interested. But the brand still feels… rough.
The site isn’t pristine. The visuals aren’t cinematic. The copy doesn’t sound like a Fortune 500.

So you pause momentum to “clean things up.”

That instinct is understandable. It’s also often the wrong move.

Some of the strongest startup brands didn’t win early by looking finished. They won by looking alive…and being good enough.

Looking “Finished” Can Muffle the Feedback You Need

At the beginning, speed of learning matters more than surface-level credibility.

Highly polished brands tend to look settled. Decisions feel final. That makes people less likely to push back, question assumptions, or offer honest feedback.

By contrast, brands that feel in motion invite participation. They signal that ideas are still forming and input is welcome.

This is one reason Substack resonated early. Its brand and product were intentionally plain, almost utilitarian. That openness made it easier for writers to shape the platform alongside the company instead of reacting to something that felt locked.

The lack of polish created room to adapt.

Early Polish Creates Premature Commitment

When something looks finished, it becomes harder to change.

Early polish creates emotional attachment. Teams defend language that no longer fits. Messaging lingers even as the product evolves.

Facebook’s early site avoided that trap. Its sparse, unfinished interface made it easy to adapt as usage data rolled in. Over time, feedback from members pushed the product toward a cleaner, more photo-driven experience. That evolution would have been harder if the brand and interface had been over-designed from the start.

Keeping your brand lighter early preserves that flexibility.
You can always add polish later. Undoing commitment is much harder.

Finished is a Psychological Trap

A “finished” look creates attachment. Once work looks complete, teams are more likely to protect it than question it—even when the market is telling them to adapt.

In contrast, Figma took a different path in its early evolution. Long before its brand system matured, its communication centered on collaboration and openness. The visual language evolved over time, but the brand stayed flexible because it wasn’t over-designed from the start.

Being less polished early keeps your brand editable.

Participation Beats Presentation

People engage more when they feel early.

Simple demos, straightforward messaging, and direct founder communication tend to outperform highly produced assets because they feel accessible. They invite response rather than applause.

This is especially true in founder-led branding. A clear idea, expressed plainly, travels further than a beautifully packaged message that says nothing new.

Where Polish Actually Matters

Now, to be clear, I’m not defending sloppiness.

Your brand still needs:

• Clear messaging

• Intentional decisions

• A sense of taste, even if it’s evolving

And if you’re in a certain category or type of business, like consumer packaged goods, polish actually goes a long way and may be the differentiator early on.

But, if you’re more on the purely digital tools or services side of things, it’s important to know the difference between being unfinished and being unclear.

Clarity builds trust. Excessive polish can delay it.

What to Do Instead

If you’re early and feeling pressure to look bigger than you are:

• Prioritize clarity over aesthetics

• Share thinking before frameworks

• Optimize for learning, not applause

You can always polish later. You can’t recover time spent waiting for perfect.

Final Thought

Early-stage brands don’t need to look complete. They need to look…and feel…honest.

The startups that grow fastest aren’t the ones that hide their edges. They’re the ones that use them to learn, adapt, and pull people in.

If your brand feels a little rough right now, good.
That might be exactly what it needs to eventually be great.

Best,

Edwin